Litigation Funding: Law, Practice, and Market Evolution (2026) in the UAE
The landscape of litigation funding in the United Arab Emirates has undergone a profound transformation as of 2026, shifting from a nascent financial practice to a cornerstone of the regional dispute resolution ecosystem. This evolution is inextricably linked to the UAE’s strategic objective of establishing itself as a premier global hub for commerce, a goal that has necessitated a sophisticated, predictable, and transparent legal framework capable of supporting high-value, complex litigation and arbitration. The current year, 2026, marks the convergence of several major legislative cycles, most notably the implementation of the new Civil Transactions Act, significant amendments to the Federal Civil Procedures Law, and a refined maturity within the common law courts of the Dubai International Financial Centre and the Abu Dhabi Global Market. As international capital continues to flow into the region’s infrastructure, energy, and technology sectors, the role of third-party litigation funding has transcended simple capital provision, becoming an essential risk-management tool for global corporations and a vital mechanism for ensuring access to justice for individual litigants.
The Tripartite Judicial Architecture as a Foundation for Finance
The legal framework of the UAE in 2026 is defined by its unique tripartite structure, which offers three distinct but increasingly integrated avenues for dispute resolution. This structure consists of the “onshore” or mainland civil law courts and the two “offshore” common law financial free zones. For a litigation funder, understanding the nuances of these jurisdictions is the primary step in evaluating any investment opportunity, as each forum presents different rules regarding disclosure, cost recoverability, and procedural speed.1
The onshore system, which applies to the vast majority of civil and commercial activities outside the financial free zones, is rooted in the civil law tradition. Historically, this system was influenced by the Egyptian model, which was itself derived from the French Napoleonic Code. By 2026, the onshore courts have achieved a high degree of modernization, characterized by the comprehensive digitization of proceedings and a pragmatic acceptance of litigation funding, provided such arrangements do not violate public policy or professional ethics.1 While third-party funding is not expressly governed by a single statute onshore, it is permitted under the broader principles of contractual freedom, provided that the funder does not exert excessive control over the proceedings in a manner that would resemble the common law prohibitions of champerty or maintenance.1
In contrast, the DIFC and ADGM offer common law environments that are specifically designed to be familiar to international investors. The DIFC has developed its own body of case law and legislation, based on English common law principles but tailored to the local environment.5 The ADGM, meanwhile, takes a more direct approach by adopting English common law as its foundational law, supplemented by its own specific regulations.5 These offshore jurisdictions have been proactive in regulating litigation funding, providing the explicit guidance that the onshore system currently lacks.2
| Judicial Forum | Legal Origin | Procedural Language | Role of Third-Party Funding (2026) |
| Onshore UAE | Civil Law / Sharia | Arabic | Permitted if compliant with public policy 1 |
| DIFC | Common Law (Autonomous) | English | Regulated via Practice Directions 2 |
| ADGM | English Common Law (Direct) | English | Formally regulated via 2019/2023 Rules 6 |
Onshore Legislative Reforms: The 2025 and 2026 Paradigm Shift
The year 2026 represents a landmark in the evolution of the onshore judiciary, driven by the implementation of Federal Decree-Law No. 22 of 2025, which introduced sweeping amendments to the Civil Procedures Law (Federal Decree-Law No. 42 of 2022).8 These reforms reflect a deliberate move toward procedural discipline, judicial specialization, and a reduction in the “serial appeals” that previously characterized mainland litigation.8 For litigation funders, these changes significantly enhance the “predictability factor,” which is a core component of their internal rate of return calculations.
One of the most significant developments is the establishment of specialized judicial chambers for technically complex disputes, such as those involving inheritance, construction, or high-value commercial transactions.8 Under Article 32 of the amended framework, the President of the Federal Judicial Council or the head of a local judicial authority can constitute these chambers, which are empowered to appoint international experts and direct more rigorous evidentiary reviews.8 Crucially, judgments issued by these specialized chambers are, in many instances, not subject to ordinary avenues of appeal, marking a shift toward the finality of first-instance decisions when technical rigor is applied from the outset.8
Furthermore, the 2026 reforms have heightened the thresholds for initiating appeals. Article 164 now requires that any appeal filed must include a clear statement of the grounds and the relief sought at the time of submission.8 This has effectively abolished the previous practice where appellants could file a “placeholder” appeal and supplement the grounds at the first hearing.8 For a funder, this reduces the risk of unmeritorious, delay-tactic appeals that erode the value of an award over time. The expansion of cassation review under Article 175 and 176 to include interlocutory decisions also allows for the early correction of procedural errors, potentially saving years of litigation time in complex cases.8
The Role of Court-Appointed Experts in Onshore Litigation
A defining feature of the onshore system remains the decisive influence of court-appointed experts. In technical matters—which comprise the majority of funded claims—the court-appointed expert acts as a quasi-judicial figure, conducting investigations, reviewing documentary evidence, and meeting with the parties to the dispute.1 By 2026, the governance of these experts has been strengthened by Federal Decree Law No. 21 of 2022, ensuring professional accountability.1
While the expert’s findings are technically not binding on the judge, they are followed in the vast majority of cases.1 This has led to a sophisticated practice where litigation funders employ “shadow experts” or private consultants to assist the funded party in managing the interface with the court expert.9 The 2026 landscape is defined by the integration of technology into this process, with experts utilizing AI-assisted translation and digital filings to manage the voluminous documentation typical of construction or banking disputes.1
| Procedural Aspect | Onshore Practice (2026) | Significance for Funders |
| Expert Witnesses | Court-appointed from a registry 1 | High impact on outcome; requires “shadow” expert support.9 |
| Discovery | No general discovery; specific document orders only 1 | Limits “fishing expeditions” and reduces costs.1 |
| Evidence | Primarily written/documentary 1 | Predictable cost structure for preparing filings.1 |
| Timing | 6 to 18 months for standard commercial cases 1 | Faster than many comparable jurisdictions; aids IRR. |
The Common Law Free Zones: Regulatory Maturity in the DIFC and ADGM
The DIFC and ADGM continue to serve as the regional vanguard for the formal regulation of litigation funding. Their approach is characterized by transparency, mandatory disclosure, and a commitment to ensuring that funding does not undermine the integrity of the judicial process.
The ADGM Litigation Funding Rules
The ADGM remains the only jurisdiction in the MENA region with a comprehensive statutory framework for third-party funding, established by the Litigation Funding Rules of 2019 and subsequent amendments.6 These rules regulate both the funders themselves and the Litigation Funding Agreements (LFAs) entered into by parties in ADGM proceedings.6 The rules strike a balance between the commercial interests of funders and the protection of the funded party, mandating that the funder remains a passive financier rather than a “controller” of the litigation.7
Under the ADGM framework, an LFA must contain specific mandatory provisions to be enforceable. These include the scope of the funding, the timing of tranches, and the exact manner in which the funder will seek recovery.7 Furthermore, the rules require the funder to submit to the jurisdiction of the ADGM Courts for the purpose of cost-related disputes, providing a significant layer of protection for defendants who might otherwise be unable to recover costs from a funded, but impecunious, claimant.7
The DIFC Practice Direction and Access to Justice
The DIFC Courts have historically utilized Practice Directions to regulate funding, most notably Practice Direction No. 2 of 2017.2 However, the most significant development in 2025 and 2026 is the issuance of Practice Direction No. 1 of 2025, which focuses on “Access to Justice in Employment Disputes”.11 This direction, effective from October 9, 2025, introduced several reforms that have catalyzed the growth of funding for individual claimants in the DIFC.
The high cost of court fees in the DIFC—historically 5% of the claim value for the first $500,000—was identified as a barrier to justice.11 Under the 2025 Practice Direction, the Registrar now has the discretion to waive or reduce these fees based on the claimant’s financial means and the merits of the claim.11 Additionally, the direction established a new general rule for employment cases: each party bears its own costs, unless a party has acted vexatiously or in bad faith.11 This “no-costs” regime significantly reduces the risk for litigation funders who previously had to account for the possibility of substantial adverse costs orders if their funded claimant was unsuccessful.12
| DIFC PD 1/2025 Provisions | Former Position | New Position (2026) |
| Adverse Costs | Loser pays winner’s costs 11 | Each party bears its own costs 12 |
| Court Fees | Fixed % of claim value 11 | Discretionary waiver/reduction/instalments 11 |
| Privacy | Public hearings/judgments 12 | Default private hearings; anonymized judgments 12 |
| Jurisdiction | Claims often capped at AED 500k for SCT 11 | Encourages full recovery in CFI 11 |
Arbitration and the New Global Standards of Disclosure
Arbitration remains the preferred method for resolving high-value commercial and construction disputes in the UAE, particularly given the region’s role in international trade. The evolution of arbitration rules in 2025 and 2026 has centered on the “professionalization” of funding, with institutions mandating disclosure to prevent conflicts of interest.
DIAC Arbitration Rules 2022 and 2026 Practice
The Dubai International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) rules, updated in 2022, have become the standard for local arbitrations following the abolition of the DIFC-LCIA Centre.14 Article 22 of the DIAC Rules is a cornerstone of the 2026 funding landscape, requiring parties to disclose the existence of a third-party funding arrangement and the identity of the funder.15 This disclosure must be made at the time of the request for arbitration or as soon as the funding agreement is concluded.15
The rationale for this disclosure is primarily to ensure that members of the arbitral tribunal do not have hidden conflicts of interest with the funder.15 In the DIAC system, the tribunal also has the power to take the existence of funding into account when apportioning the final costs of the arbitration, including whether the funder has committed to meet any adverse costs liability.15 By 2026, the “DIFC as default seat” provision in the DIAC rules has provided a stable common law supervisory framework for arbitrations, even when the underlying dispute is related to mainland assets.18
The Impact of the CIArb Guideline (2025)
In September 2025, the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb) published its Guideline on Third-Party Funding, which has been widely adopted by practitioners in the UAE.19 While “soft law,” the guideline provides an ethical framework that distinguishes between legitimate transparency and “intrusive inquiry”.19 It reinforces the principle that while the funder’s identity must be known, the specific commercial terms of the LFA—such as the success multiple or the “waterfall” of payments—should remain confidential unless they are relevant to a specific challenge.19 This has provided comfort to funders who were previously wary of their trade secrets being exposed to opponents during the disclosure phase.
| Institution / Rule | Disclosure Timing | Information Required | Tribunal’s Power |
| DIAC Art. 22 | At commencement or mid-stream 15 | Existence and Identity of Funder 17 | Consider funding in cost apportionment 15 |
| SIAC (2025) | “As soon as practicable” 20 | Identity and contact details 20 | Sanctions for non-disclosure 21 |
| ICC Art. 11(7) | Promptly 19 | Non-party with economic interest 19 | Manage conflicts of interest 22 |
| HKIAC Art. 44 | At commencement 19 | Existence and subsequent changes 22 | Broad discretion on cost allocation |
Market Evolution: 2026 Investment Criteria and Corporate Trends
The litigation funding market in the UAE in 2026 is no longer a “distressed assets” market. It has matured into a strategic financial sector characterized by the entry of major global funders like Omni Bridgeway, Burford Capital, and specialized boutique funds.23
Funder Investment Criteria in the UAE
Funders in 2026 operate with a high degree of selectivity, with acceptance rates often below 5% of pitched cases.22 Their due diligence process is exhaustive, focusing on the “trinity” of merit, quantum, and recoverability.9
- Legal Merit and Viability: Funders require a clear legal path to victory, typically supported by a formal legal opinion from a reputable firm. In the onshore system, this includes an assessment of how a court-appointed expert is likely to view the technical facts.9
- Claim Value (Quantum): Given the high costs of legal representation and expert work in the UAE, funders generally look for claims where the realistic recovery is at least $5 million to $10 million.9 The “10-to-1” rule—where the claim value should be ten times the estimated legal costs—is a standard benchmark for profitability.
- Recoverability and Enforcement: A judgment in the DIFC or an award in DIAC is only as valuable as the assets that can be seized to satisfy it. Funders conduct deep-dive asset traces into the respondent’s holdings, both within the UAE and internationally.5 The 2026 focus on “Conduit Jurisdiction”—using the DIFC to ratify a foreign judgment for enforcement onshore—remains a vital, though complex, strategy.5
Portfolio Financing and Corporate Distress
By 2026, a significant shift has occurred toward “Portfolio Financing.” Instead of funding a single case, funders provide a line of credit to a corporation or a law firm to support a basket of several unrelated disputes.9 This model allows the funder to cross-collateralize their risk; a win in one large construction arbitration can cover the losses of two smaller commercial litigations in the portfolio.9 For law firms in Dubai and Abu Dhabi, this allows them to offer “success-based” fees to their clients while still receiving a portion of their hourly rates from the funder.
The 2026 market also reflects the region’s economic realities. The fallout from the 2024 floods and the subsequent surge in insurance subrogation claims has created a high-volume market for portfolio funding in the motor and property sectors.26 Furthermore, the introduction of the new Commercial Companies Law (2025) has led to an increase in shareholder disputes and “drag-along/tag-along” litigation, which are highly attractive to funders due to the high values involved.27
The Rise of Litigation Insurance: A Complementary Ecosystem
A major trend in 2026 is the bifurcation of the market between “capital provision” (funding) and “risk transfer” (insurance). While third-party funding provides the cash to run a case, litigation insurance manages the downside risk.28
After-the-Event (ATE) and Judgment Preservation Insurance
After-the-Event insurance has become a standard requirement for many funded matters in the UAE. It covers the “adverse costs” that a claimant might be ordered to pay to the defendant if the claim fails.28 In the ADGM, where the “loser pays” principle is strictly applied, ATE insurance is often a prerequisite for a funder to commit capital.7
More innovatively, 2026 has seen the rise of “Judgment Preservation Insurance” (JPI) and “Litigation Buy-Out” (LBO) insurance.28 JPI is used by a claimant who has already won a judgment in the Court of First Instance; it “locks in” the value of the win against the risk of the judgment being overturned or reduced on appeal.28 LBO insurance is used by defendants, particularly during M&A transactions, to “ring-fence” a liability and remove it from the balance sheet, allowing the transaction to proceed without the “cloud” of pending litigation.28
| Product | Function | Use Case in UAE (2026) |
| ATE Insurance | Covers adverse costs liability 28 | High-value ADGM/DIFC commercial disputes. |
| JPI | Insures a win against appeal risk 28 | Post-CFI wins in complex construction cases. |
| LBO Insurance | Ring-fences a known liability 28 | M&A transactions involving local conglomerates. |
| BTE Insurance | Covers future, unknown disputes | General corporate compliance/governance. |
The Impact of the New Civil Transactions Law (2025/2026)
The entry into force of the New Civil Transactions Act (NCTA) on January 1, 2026, has recalibrated how contracts are interpreted and how damages are awarded onshore.4 The NCTA repeals the 1985 Act and introduces several provisions that are highly relevant to the litigation funding industry.4
Recalibration of Public Order and Good Faith
The NCTA narrows the definition of “Public Order,” which was previously a broad and sometimes unpredictable concept used to challenge contract enforcement.29 By confining public order to conclusive Sharia provisions and mandatory legal rules, the NCTA enhances “contractual certainty”—the bedrock of a funder’s risk assessment.29 Furthermore, the NCTA introduces clearer standards for pre-contractual negotiations and “bad faith” conduct, potentially opening new avenues for litigation where a party has walked away from a deal unfairly.29
Judicial Assessment of Agreed Compensation
One of the most significant changes for the construction and energy sectors—traditional hotspots for funding—is found in Article 340 of the NCTA.29 Previously, UAE courts had a broad power to adjust “agreed compensation” (liquidated damages) to match the actual loss suffered. Article 340 now limits this judicial oversight; the court may only reduce the agreed amount if it is proven to be “excessive” or if the obligation has been partially performed.29 This shift toward respecting the “bargained-for” compensation allows funders to model their potential recoveries with much greater precision.29
| Legal Area | Old Position (1985 Act) | New Position (NCTA 2026) |
| Public Order | Broad, Egyptian-influenced 4 | Narrow, structured definition 29 |
| Liquidated Damages | Frequently adjusted by courts | Presumed valid unless “excessive” 29 |
| Age of Majority | 21 lunar years 29 | 18 Gregorian years 29 |
| Professional Firms | Limited liability was complex | Modern framework for professional LLCs 29 |
Digital Justice and AI: The 2026 “Electronic State”
The UAE’s litigation landscape in 2026 is defined by “Human Expertise with Digital Efficiency”.1 The Federal Decree Law No. 21 of 2022 and the Electronic Transactions and Trust Services Law provide the stable foundation for what is now a paperless judicial system.1
AI-Assisted Translation and Remote Hearings
The integration of AI into judicial operations has addressed one of the historical challenges of the onshore system: the Arabic language requirement for all filings and oral pleadings.1 By 2026, the courts utilize AI-assisted translation for the immediate conversion of English-language documentary evidence into Arabic for the judge’s review, and vice versa for foreign litigants tracking the case via online dashboards.1 Remote hearings are no longer an “emergency” measure but the default for procedural hearings and expert meetings, significantly reducing the “billable hour” costs for lawyers and the “travel and disbursement” costs for funders.1
E-Filing and Judicial Specialization
All court filings in 2026 occur through centralized electronic portals, such as the Ministry of Justice’s federal portal or the independent portals of Dubai and Ras Al Khaimah.1 This has enabled “Judicial Specialization” at a granular level. AI algorithms are used to assign cases to judges based on their historical experience with specific subjects, such as maritime law or intellectual property.1 For a funder, this reduces the “judge lottery” risk and ensures that complex cases are heard by individuals with the necessary technical background.
The Evolution of “Access to Justice” and Reputational Management
The 2026 perspective on litigation funding has shifted from viewing it as a “predatory” financial practice to seeing it as a necessary tool for maintaining the UAE’s reputation as a fair and accessible jurisdiction for all.
Protecting Reputations in Employment and Professional Disputes
The DIFC’s PD 1/2025 specifically addressed the “reputational damage” that often deterred high-level executives from suing their former employers.12 In a small, interconnected market like Dubai’s financial district, the publication of a lawsuit could be “career-ending”.12 By making employment proceedings private by default and anonymizing final judgments, the DIFC has created a “safe space” for legitimate claims.12 This has led to a surge in funding for “Professional Indemnity” and “Executive Employment” claims, which were previously settled for “pennies on the dollar” due to the claimant’s fear of publicity.
Social Impact and the “Non-Profit” Company Regime
The 2026 amendments to the Commercial Companies Law formally recognize “non-profit companies” for the first time.27 These entities can pursue social, philanthropic, or developmental purposes, with any surplus reinvested in their mission.27 This has opened the door for “Social Impact Litigation Funds” that focus on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) litigation—such as claims against polluters or for the protection of digital safety under the 2025 Child Digital Safety Law.27
Strategic Conclusions: Navigating the UAE Dispute Market in 2026
The UAE has successfully positioned itself as the most “funding-friendly” jurisdiction in the MENA region by 2026. However, success for practitioners and investors requires a deep understanding of the interlocking pieces of this legal puzzle.
The “onshore” system is no longer the “slower” option; the 2025 reforms have accelerated timelines and focused on technical finality, making it highly suitable for construction and maritime disputes where the evidence is primarily documentary.1 The “offshore” systems of the DIFC and ADGM remain the “gold standard” for regulatory certainty, but they are increasingly being used as “conduits” for the enforcement of international judgments and awards, requiring a sophisticated multi-jurisdictional strategy.5
For the litigation funder, the UAE offers a “high-alpha” market. The high values of the claims, the professionalization of the judiciary, and the clear rules on disclosure have removed much of the “opaque” risk that characterized the region a decade ago. However, the 25% cap on lawyer contingency fees onshore and the new cost-bearing rules in the DIFC mean that the “math” of a deal must be more precise than ever.2
As the UAE continues to lead the region in legal innovation, the integration of technology, the maturity of the insurance ecosystem, and the strategic recalibration of civil law through the NCTA suggest that the growth of litigation funding is not a temporary trend but a permanent shift in how justice is financed and delivered in the 21st-century Middle East. The 2026 state of play demonstrates that the UAE has not just “permitted” litigation funding; it has “institutionalized” it as a vital component of a modern, world-class judicial system.
Works cited
- Litigation 2026 – UAE – Global Practice Guides – Chambers and Partners, accessed on April 13, 2026, https://practiceguides.chambers.com/practice-guides/litigation-2026/uae
- Onshore UAE Pro-Arbitration Court Decisions 2024-2025 – Aceris Law LLC, accessed on April 13, 2026, https://www.acerislaw.com/onshore-uae-pro-arbitration-court-decisions-2024-2025/
- Middle East Update – January 2024 – Quinn Emanuel, accessed on April 13, 2026, https://www.quinnemanuel.com/the-firm/publications/middle-east-update-january-2024/
- The Conflict-of-Law Rules in the UAE’s New Civil Transactions Act: Yet Another Missed Opportunity!, accessed on April 13, 2026, https://conflictoflaws.net/2026/the-conflict-of-law-rules-in-the-uaes-new-civil-transactions-act-yet-another-missed-opportunity/
- DIFC / ADGM Litigation – Dubai Lawyers – HAS Law Firm Dubai, accessed on April 13, 2026, https://has.law/practice-area/difc-adgm-litigation/
- ADGM Litigation Funding Rules – Clifford Chance, accessed on April 13, 2026, https://www.cliffordchance.com/briefings/2019/07/adgm_litigation_fundingrules.html
- ADGM COURTS ISSUE LITIGATION FUNDING RULES, accessed on April 13, 2026, https://www.augustaventures.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/ADGM-TPF-Rules.pdf
- UAE Civil Procedures: What the 2026 Reforms Mean for You – BSA LAW, accessed on April 13, 2026, https://bsalaw.com/insight/uae-civil-procedures-what-the-2026-reforms-mean-for-you/
- Litigation Funding in the UAE: How It Works & Key Benefits., accessed on April 13, 2026, https://www.khairallahlegal.com/litigation-funding-in-the-uae/
- Litigation 2026 – UAE | Global Practice Guides – Chambers and Partners, accessed on April 13, 2026, https://practiceguides.chambers.com/practice-guides/litigation-2026/uae/trends-and-developments
- DIFC Courts issue new Practice Direction to improve access to justice, accessed on April 13, 2026, https://www.hsfkramer.com/notes/middle-east/2025-posts/difc-courts-issue-new-practice-direction-to-improve-access-to-justice
- DIFC Courts Employment Claims – Access to Justice Practice Direction, accessed on April 13, 2026, https://www.simmons-simmons.com/en/publications/cmgywppf9004uveycbux5bqps/difc-courts-issue-new-practice-direction-on-access-to-justice-in-ed
- Advancing Fairness in Employment Litigation: DIFC Courts Issue Practice Direction No. 1 of 2025 – Alsuwaidi & Company, accessed on April 13, 2026, https://alsuwaidi.ae/advancing-fairness-in-employment-litigation-difc-courts-issue-practice-direction-no-1-of-2025/
- International Arbitration in the Middle East: 2024 in Review and What to Expect in 2025, accessed on April 13, 2026, https://www.cov.com/en/news-and-insights/insights/2025/01/international-arbitration-in-the-middle-east-2024-in-review-and-what-to-expect-in-2025
- DIAC ARBITRATION RULES – Dubai International Arbitration Centre …, accessed on April 13, 2026, https://www.diac.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/DIAC-Arbitration-Rules-2022_EN.pdf
- Disclosing Third-Party Funding in International Arbitration: Where Are We Now?, accessed on April 13, 2026, https://www.charlesrussellspeechlys.com/en/insights/expert-insights/litigation–dispute-resolution/2022/disclosure-obligations-and-third-party-funding/
- DIAC 2022 Rules of Arbitration: A Modernised Set of Rules for a New Era – Blogs overview, accessed on April 13, 2026, https://legalblogs.wolterskluwer.com/arbitration-blog/diac-2022-rules-of-arbitration-a-modernised-set-of-rules-for-a-new-era/
- DIAC Arbitration Rules – Aceris Law LLC, accessed on April 13, 2026, https://www.acerislaw.com/diac-arbitration-rules/
- The CIArb’s Guidance on Third-Party Funding: Codifying Best Practice and Shifting the Debate | Kluwer Arbitration Blog, accessed on April 13, 2026, https://legalblogs.wolterskluwer.com/arbitration-blog/the-ciarbs-guidance-on-third-party-funding-codifying-best-practice-and-shifting-the-debate/
- Guideline on Third-Party Funding – Chartered Institute of Arbitrators, accessed on April 13, 2026, https://www.ciarb.org/media/xbbegf1e/guidelines-on-third-party-funding_-published-final.pdf
- 7th Edition of the SIAC Rules published and to take effect in 2025 – Herbert Smith Freehills, accessed on April 13, 2026, https://www.hsfkramer.com/notes/arbitration/2024-posts/7th-Edition-of-SIAC-Rules-published-and-will-take-effect-in-2025
- Arbitration Funding in 2025: Measured Reform, Continued Expansion, accessed on April 13, 2026, https://www.deminor.com/en/news-insights/arbitration-funding-in-2025-measured-reform-continued-expansion/
- Litigation Funding, Middle East-wide, Litigation Support | Chambers Rankings, accessed on April 13, 2026, https://chambers.com/legal-rankings/litigation-funding-middle-east-wide-58:2816:16087:1
- Omni Bridgeway – Litigation financing | Litigation funding, accessed on April 13, 2026, https://omnibridgeway.com/
- THE LAST 365 DAYS IN THE DIFC COURTS | Article | Chambers …, accessed on April 13, 2026, https://chambers.com/articles/the-last-365-days-in-the-difc-courts
- UAE trends and developments in insurance litigation – Kennedys Law, accessed on April 13, 2026, https://www.kennedyslaw.com/en/thought-leadership/article/2025/uae-trends-and-developments-in-insurance-litigation/
- UAE Commercial Companies Law: Key changes and what they mean for business, accessed on April 13, 2026, https://www.reedsmith.com/articles/uae-commercial-companies-law-key-changes-and-what-they-mean-for-business/
- The Evolving Landscape of Litigation Funding & Insurance: What the next generation of disputes lawyers needs to know. – TheJudge Global, accessed on April 13, 2026, https://www.thejudgeglobal.com/en/uk/news/the-evolving-landscape-of-litigation-funding-amp-insurance-what-the-next-generation-of-lawyers-needs-to-know
- How the new UAE Civil Transactions Law Recalibrates Contract Disputes, accessed on April 13, 2026, https://www.tamimi.com/our-knowledge/publications/eyes-on-2026/articles/how-the-new-uae-civil-transactions-law-recalibrates-contract-disputes/
- UAE IT Law Updates, Data Protection Compliance, Cybersecurity and AI Regulation: A 2026 Practical Guide for Digital and Financial Businesses – ProConsult Advocates & Legal Consultants, accessed on April 13, 2026, https://uaeahead.com/uae-it-law-updates-2026-guide/